Quick reference on Medical Device Reporting Timelines

Once the company became aware of reportable incident the clock starts. If a death or serious injury has occurred it has to be reported between 2 and 10 calendar days (refer below table). Less serious events/incidents can be reported in 15 to 30 calendar days. If there is an incident but unsure if it is reportable, submit a report anyway. It’s important to remember that filing a report on an incident/event is not an admission of either liability or that device caused or contributed to the event. When in doubt, report.

File a report with a medical device Regulatory Authority when:

  • A death or serious deterioration of health has occurred.
  • A serious public health threat has emerged.
  • A sustained negative trend has developed.
  • A recall or field safety corrective action (FSCA) has been issued.

Generally, if labeling is sufficient, reporting is not required when:

  • There is a very small likelihood of death or serious injury.
  • The incident was caused by patient/user error.
  • The service life or shelf life of the device was exceeded.
  • The side effects were predictable and disclosed.
  • A device problem was discovered by the user prior to use.
  • The device shutoff or fault mechanism worked as designed.

Medical Device Reporting Timelines in 6 major markets:

  • *      European requirements are for the Medical Device Regulation (2017/745).
  • **    Japan has specific reporting timelines for incidents involving device malfunctions, breakages, and fault that could lead to serious events.
  • ***  Only required if you also sell the same device in this market. Types of reportable events vary by country. The US FDA requires the reporting of all ex-US events but in Brazil, for example, this only applies to “deaths, serious deterioration of health, and counterfeit devices.”


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

5 responses to “Quick reference on Medical Device Reporting Timelines”

  1. Stefan Avatar
    Stefan

    It would be helpful to reference the sources. Otherwise it is difficult for the reader to verify the information.

    1. Ramya Avatar
      Ramya

      👍

    2. Ramya Avatar
      Ramya

      I am going to publish MDR vigilance from different markets in separate posts with reference. This article is just for quick reference. Anyway thanks for your feedback.

  2. Amido Avatar
    Amido

    Is expected assessment needed for EU MDR?

  3. Karan Sanjay Chandgude Avatar
    Karan Sanjay Chandgude

    Can you please provide medical device reporting timelines for INDIA and CHINA?

Leave a Reply

error: Content is protected !!